Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie vs Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge


vs
Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie×BrossardRosemont-La Petite-Patrie×GatineauBrossard×Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-RougeGatineau×Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-RougeLe Plateau-Mont-Royal×VerdunLachine×Saint-LaurentSherbrooke×Trois-RivièresLaval×QuébecGatineau×SaguenayBeauport×CharlesbourgLe Plateau-Mont-Royal×La Cité-LimoilouRosemont-La Petite-Patrie×BrossardRosemont-La Petite-Patrie×GatineauBrossard×Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-RougeGatineau×Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-RougeLe Plateau-Mont-Royal×VerdunLachine×Saint-LaurentSherbrooke×Trois-RivièresLaval×QuébecGatineau×SaguenayBeauport×CharlesbourgLe Plateau-Mont-Royal×La Cité-Limoilou
Comparison
The same numbers,
side by side.
Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie leads on 6 of the 7 dimensions compared. Between Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie and Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge, 11 public indicators line up. Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie shows 134,038 residents on population versus 107,657 residents for Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge. Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie records 15.9 km² on area, against 96.7 km² in Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge. on density, Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie reaches 8,457 residents per km² while Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge sits at 1,113 residents per km². Sharpest gap: Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie leads by 7.6× more on density, while Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge regains ground by 6.1× more on area.
| Indicator | Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie | Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge |
|---|---|---|
| Population (residents) | 134 038 | 107 657 |
| Area (square kilometres) | 15,9 km² | 96,7 km² |
| Density (residents per km²) | 8 457 | 1 113 |
| Public trees (maintained public trees) | 37 291 | 34 636 |
| Bus stops (stops) | 482 | 877 |
| Schools (schools (MEQ)) | 37 | 27 |
| Primary schools (primary schools) | 23 | 15 |
| Secondary schools (secondary schools) | 5 | 3 |
| Public schools (public schools) | 31 | 20 |
| Private schools (private schools) | 6 | 7 |
| CEGEPs (CEGEPs and colleges) | 10 | 7 |
In short
The major difference between these two sectors lies in their space: Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge has an area of 96.7 km², which is about 6.1 times more (510% more) than Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie and its 15.9 km². This immense territorial difference explains why Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie has a density of 8,457 inhabitants per km², representing about 7.6 times more (660% more) than its Quebec City counterpart at 1,113 inhabitants per km². While the Montreal sector focuses on highly concentrated local urban life, the large Quebec City borough spreads its residential neighborhoods over a vast territory.
Questions
Questions about Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie vs Sainte-Foy–Sillery–Cap-Rouge
- Which sector should I choose for public transit accessibility?
- Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge has 877 bus stops, which is 82% more than Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie with 482 stops. The Quebec City sector relies on this vast network to cover its large territory, while Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie relies on the compactness of its streets.
- What is the best choice for families with young children?
- Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie offers a dense educational environment with 22 primary schools, which is 47% more than Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge with 15 schools. The Montreal neighborhood makes walking to local schools very easy.
- How do secondary and public school offerings compare?
- Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie has 5 secondary schools (67% more than the 3 in Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge) and 30 public schools (50% more than the 20 in its rival). Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge has a slight lead in private schools with 7 compared to 6 in Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie.
- If I want a green environment, which one offers more public trees?
- Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie has 37,291 public trees on its territory, compared to 34,636 for Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge, an absolute difference of 2,655 trees. Although Sainte-Foy-Sillery-Cap-Rouge is much larger, street tree alignments are particularly dense in the Montreal sector.
Other pairs
Explore other comparisons.
Compare 2 other neighbourhoods
Pick freely from all covered places.

